Rewriting History at the Smithsonian
Summary
In July 2025, the Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History removed all references to President Donald Trump’s two impeachments from the “Limits of Presidential Power” exhibit. Under the guise of a “content review,” the museum reverted the display to its 2008 appearance, effectively freezing the historical record prior to the Trump era. The display now states that “only three presidents have seriously faced removal” (Johnson, Nixon, Clinton), deliberately omitting the only president to be impeached twice.
Capture Mechanism: Anticipatory Obedience
This case illustrates how institutional fear functions as a censorship mechanism. The removal was not the result of a direct order to change the specific exhibit, but the outcome of a “content review” the Smithsonian Board of Regents agreed to undertake to appease the White House.
- The Trigger: A March 2025 Executive Order demanded the elimination of “anti-American ideology” across the institution.
- The Pressure: The White House attempted to fire Kim Sajet, Director of the National Portrait Gallery, explicitly citing the caption on Trump’s portrait (which mentioned his impeachments) as evidence of “partisan bias.”
- The Capitulation: While the Board of Regents legally resisted the President’s authority to fire Sajet directly, they internalized the regime’s logic by launching a system-wide scrutiny of content. Sajet subsequently resigned, citing the “distraction,” and the history museum preemptively sanitized its own exhibits.
The Chilling Effect: The Sherald Withdrawal
The atmosphere of “institutional fear” has extended beyond historical records to artistic expression. In the same week as the exhibit erasure, celebrated artist Amy Sherald (painter of Michelle Obama’s official portrait) pulled an upcoming exhibition from the Portrait Gallery. She cited the museum’s consideration of removing a painting of a transgender woman posing as the Statue of Liberty, stating: “It’s clear that institutional fear shaped by a broader climate of political hostility toward trans lives played a role.”
Analysis
The Smithsonian case demonstrates the successful operationalization of the “Anti-American Ideology” Executive Order. By threatening leadership purges (Sajet) and funding cuts, the administration forces independent cultural institutions to self-censor. The result is State-Enforced Revisionism, where the official historical narrative is curated to protect the leader’s image, and the institutions charged with preserving history become accomplices in its erasure.
Related Cases
- The Death of Public Broadcasting (2025): A parallel assault on cultural institutions via funding cuts.
- Enforcing the Narrative: The Purge of Karen Attiah (2025): Another instance of personnel removal enforcing narrative conformity.