Regulatory Demolition: The Death of Energy Star
Summary
In May 2025, EPA managers announced the elimination of the Energy Star program and the Office of Atmospheric Protection. Energy Star, a voluntary labeling program created in 1992, had saved American consumers over $500 billion in utility costs and prevented 4 billion metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions. Despite pleas from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and manufacturers to save the “effective non-regulatory program,” the administration moved to “deprioritize and eliminate” all climate work not explicitly required by statute.
Capture Mechanisms
1. Governance by Sabotage
The elimination of Energy Star defies economic logic. The program costs a mere $32 million to run but delivers $40 billion in annual savings to consumers. Its destruction contradicts the administration’s stated goal of reducing household costs and addressing an “energy emergency” where demand is expected to spike 50% by 2040.
- The Logic: This is negative governance. The state is acting to increase energy consumption and consumer costs, benefiting fossil fuel interests and removing market pressure on appliance manufacturers to innovate.
2. Scientific Dispersion & Union Busting
The restructuring goes beyond cutting programs; it targets the agency’s institutional memory and labor power.
- Dispersion: Scientists are being “dispersed” from independent research offices into other divisions, diluting their ability to conduct autonomous climate science.
- Exclusion: Marie Owens Powell, president of the EPA’s largest union, was physically and digitally barred from meetings discussing the reorganization, a tactic she labeled “nothing short of union busting.”
Analysis
The death of Energy Star proves that “deregulation” is not about efficiency but about extractive license. When a program is voluntary, popular (90% recognition), profitable for consumers, and supported by industry trade groups, its elimination can only be explained by ideological animus against conservation and a desire to maximize energy consumption. It signals that the EPA’s new mission is not environmental protection, but the facilitation of resource exhaustion.
Related Cases
- Regulatory Demolition: Fence-Line Monitoring (2025): A parallel move to blind the public to industrial pollution.
- The Great Data Blackout (2025): Similar tactics of dispersing experts to destroy independent oversight.