Skip to main content
Hemlock Collective Logo Hemlock Collective
Executive capture

Trade Incoherence: The Argentine Beef Pivot

Proposed
Case Dossier FED-TRD-004
STATUS
Proposed
SEVERITY
High
DATE
2025-10-20
DOMAIN
Executive Capture
SUBDOMAIN
Trade Incoherence
CAPTURE VECTOR
Ideological cronyism
TAGS
trade agriculture beef tariffs inflation javier-milei argentina
Back to Case Files
Facing record beef prices caused partly by his own tariffs, President Trump proposes flooding the U.S. market with Argentine beef. This contradicts his 'America First' doctrine and enrages domestic ranchers, but serves to prop up the struggling government of ideological ally Javier Milei.

Summary

By October 2025, U.S. ground beef prices hit a record $7 per pound, driven by drought and the inflationary impact of the administration’s broad tariffs. In a stark reversal of his protectionist “America First” mantra, President Trump proposed importing beef from Argentina to lower prices. This proposal coincides with a $20 billion lifeline the administration extended to the government of Argentine President Javier Milei.

Capture Mechanism: Ideological Cronyism Over Domestic Interest

This case demonstrates how foreign policy goals—specifically, propping up a fellow right-wing populist leader—override domestic economic commitments.

  • The Betrayal: The proposal enraged U.S. cattle ranchers and GOP allies like Rep. Thomas Massie (“This is not America First!”). Industry leaders warned that flooding the market with cheaper, potentially lower-quality beef (citing foot-and-mouth disease risks) would “take down our own industry.”
  • The Client State: The move is part of a broader effort to save Milei’s government (“Argentina is fighting for its life,” Trump stated). The administration is using U.S. market access as a form of foreign aid to a political ally, even at the expense of American producers.
  • The Double Bind: American farmers are simultaneously losing export markets, as China shifts soybean purchases to Brazil and Argentina to avoid U.S. tariffs. The administration’s policy thus hits rural America twice: cutting off their exports while undercutting their domestic prices with imports.

Analysis

The Argentine Beef Pivot reveals the incoherence of authoritarian trade policy. Principles like “protectionism” or “food safety” are fluid, discarded whenever they conflict with the leader’s immediate political needs (lowering inflation) or personal alliances (supporting Milei). It establishes a precedent where domestic industries can be sacrificed to stabilize foreign client states.