Skip to main content
Hemlock Collective Logo Hemlock Collective
Rule of law

The Kirk Assassination: Pretext for Criminalizing Dissent

Active campaign
Case Dossier JUD-LAW-002
STATUS
Active campaign
SEVERITY
Critical
DATE
2025-09-15
DOMAIN
Rule of Law
SUBDOMAIN
Lawfare
CAPTURE VECTOR
Pretextual authoritarianism
TAGS
lawfare domestic-terrorism first-amendment irs-weaponization jd-vance marco-rubio pam-bondi
Back to Case Files
Following the assassination of Charlie Kirk, the administration launches a synchronized 'whole-of-government' assault on civil liberties. This includes designating political opposition as domestic terrorism, weaponizing the IRS against nonprofits, and revoking visas for speech deemed 'celebratory' of the killing.

Summary

In mid-September 2025, the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk was immediately leveraged by the administration as a casus belli for a broad crackdown on the political left. While authorities identified a lone suspect, President Trump and Vice President JD Vance framed the event as the result of a “vast domestic terrorist network” of liberal NGOs.

  • The Campaign: Officials vowed to revoke visas, investigate “hate speech” (redefined as criticism of the right), and designate nonprofits as terrorist organizations to strip their tax-exempt status automatically.
  • The Targets: Specific entities like the Ford Foundation and Open Society Foundations were singled out by Vance, despite having no connection to the violence.
  • The Chill: The campaign extended to private employers, with Vance urging citizens to “call their employer” if they saw someone celebrating the death, leading to firings at The Washington Post and Clemson University.

Capture Mechanism: Regime-Level Lawfare

The administration is systematically converting the machinery of the state into a tool for political retribution:

  • IRS Weaponization: By threatening to designate domestic groups as “terrorists,” the administration seeks to bypass the legal hurdles of standard audits and instantly vaporize the funding of opposition groups.
  • Visa Revocation: Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed the denial of visas to foreigners for speech acts (“celebrating” the killing), effectively exporting the First Amendment crackdown.
  • Military Surveillance: The DOD announced it was tracking personnel for “mocking” Kirk, conflating political dissent with military indiscipline.

Analysis

This case illustrates the transition from stochastic terrorism (inciting violence against enemies) to state terror (using the law to destroy them). The assassination provided the “Reichstag Fire” moment needed to justify measures—such as domestic terror designations for political opponents—that would otherwise be legally and politically impossible. The goal is to criminalize the infrastructure of dissent.