Skip to main content
Hemlock Collective Logo Hemlock Collective
Voting rights

Rani Dasi: The Human Cost of Administrative Suppression

Active litigation
Case Dossier VOT-SUP-002
STATUS
Active litigation
SEVERITY
High
DATE
2025-06-18
DOMAIN
Voting Rights
SUBDOMAIN
Voter Purges
CAPTURE VECTOR
Administrative suppression
TAGS
north-carolina voter-purge disenfranchisement doj hava bureaucratic-violence
Back to Case Files
The Justice Department sues North Carolina to purge over 200,000 voters, including long-time citizen Rani Dasi, based on clerical errors and 'missing' ID numbers. This action weaponizes the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) to disenfranchise eligible voters through bureaucratic attrition.

Summary

In May 2025, the Trump administration’s Justice Department sued the North Carolina State Board of Elections, alleging violations of the 2002 Help America Vote Act (HAVA). The suit targets a list of over 200,000 voters—including Rani Dasi, a U.S. citizen who has voted in 20 elections since 2007—claiming their registrations are “incomplete” due to missing driver’s license or Social Security numbers. Most of these omissions are the result of clerical errors or older registration forms that did not mandate such data, not voter ineligibility.

Capture Mechanism: Weaponized Bureaucracy

This case illustrates a strategy of disenfranchisement by audit.

  • The Pretext: The administration is using a technical compliance argument (missing data fields) to challenge the eligibility of hundreds of thousands of voters.
  • The Recycling: The list of 200,000 “incomplete” registrations has been used repeatedly—in a 2023 complaint, a 2024 GOP lawsuit, and a 2024 Supreme Court race challenge—despite evidence that the voters are eligible citizens.
  • The Goal: By demanding “full compliance” and forcing the state to contact every voter to “cure” these clerical defects, the DOJ creates a procedural trap. If voters miss the notice or fail to navigate the bureaucracy, they are purged.

Analysis

The regime is transforming voting from a right into a precarious privilege contingent on perfect administrative hygiene. By shifting the burden of proof onto the voter to correct state-side clerical errors, the administration achieves mass disenfranchisement without needing to pass new restrictive laws. It is a “soft purge” disguised as election integrity.